- Edited
@SerViette @joystmp @Vlad
Currently the performance between the default lists and the ones listed by joystmp is identical based on every test I have done. That includes the d3ward test and real world tests on some ad-infested sites such as https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/ and https://www.golem.de/. The performance is not at Firefox + uBlock Origin level yet but that is being worked on.
The ultimate goal would be to leverage the native blocker (incredibly fast, good performance and low resource usage) in conjunction with an optional advanced script-based blocking solution for the shortcomings mentioned by @Anatomy5803 — achieving a best of both worlds blocking experience.
To summarize, you should be fine with either block list configuration for now but exciting additions are on the horizon if all goes according to plan
If there are individuals who are well-versed in all things adblocking on WebKit, feel free to share your insights.