Change wording of "Block Web Fonts" for consistency with other controls

wonderful-saha

Hi!

What does your feature entail?

I would like to suggest changing the "Block Web Fonts" option under "Website Settings" to "Allow Web Fonts" (also inverting what the toggle does).

What is it for?

Consistency and readability. This would bring the wording inline with the other options, such as "Enable Content Blockers". I personally have to re-read the setting sometimes because it's nestled between two positive (allow) options.

How will it affect existing workflows or user experience?

Other than inverting the toggle itself, I don't think it will impact current user workflows.

What are the exact ways that you see a user using your proposed feature?

Same as now. Just inverted wording.

Mockup below

Thank you for your consideration!

Yannick

It's the little details that make great products. Thank you for your suggestion.

gr

Yes, please, it's really standing out.

TBF, the other options are also confusing, with some enhancing privacy while other reduce it.

It would be good to find a wording and way of working that is concistent across all options.

I get it that Cookies, Javascript and Web Fonts can be trickier than the in-page features, but yeah, it would make sense to have these all at the same level.
PS: These three could still still with the others, and apply only on next page load. A message could be shown, but not a blocker.

Proposal:

Enable Content Blockers

Enable Intelligent Tracking Prevention

Enable Reader Mode

Enable Page Tweaks
—————

Page Zoom:

Auto-Play: Picture in Picture:

Pop-up Windows:

User Agent:

SSL Certificate Check:
—————

Javascript:

Cookies:

Web fonts:

Camera:

Microphone:

Screen Sharing: Location:

Notifications:

Downloads:

External Apps: